Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00304
Original file (PD 2014 00304.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-00304
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141114
SEPARATION DATE: 20070412


SUMMARY OF CASE: The available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve SGT/E-5 ( 11B20/ Infantryman ) medically separated for a bilateral ankle condition . The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Milit ary Occupational Specialty or physical fitness standards . He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral ankle condition , characterized as “ Right Ankle pain, limitation of movement, s/p surgical repair” and “ Left Ankle pain, limitation of movement, s / p surgical repair ”, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded five other conditions ( low back pain, bilateral knee p ain, proteinuria, elevated LFTs and obesity) for PEB adjudication. The P EB adjudicated c hronic bilateral ankle pain as unfitting, rated at 10 %, referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy . The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: “– Both ankles instability – Sleep apnea severe – Both knees arthritis”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting ankle condition is addressed below. The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention for ratings of his bilateral knee condition that was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB and emphasizes that disability compensation may only be offered for those conditions that cut short the member’s service career. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements; a Service disability rating IAW the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation will be recommended. No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.








RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20070228
 VA – (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic bilateral ankle pain… 5099-5003 10% Right Ankle Ligament Instability, Status Post Brostrom Repair 5271 10% 200 70812
Left Ankle Ligament Instability, Status Post Brostrom Repair 5271 10% 20070812
Bilateral knee pain, bursitis Not Unfitting Bursitis, Left Knee 5260 10% 20070812
Bursitis, Right Knee 5260 10% 20070812
Other x 4 (Not in Scope)
 Combined: 80%
Rating: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80229 .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Bilateral ankle conditions. Review of the service treatment record (STR) indicated that the CI sustained a series of ankle sprains, most notably the right ankle in November 2004 and the left ankle in October 2005. The CI had persistent pain and instability (with recurrent sprains), leading to both a right ankle surgery in February 2006 (modified Brostrom reconstruction) 
14 months prior to separation and in October 2006 the CI’s had a left ankle surgery (modified Brostrom) 6 months prior to separation. However, the CI continued to have persistent pain and instability of both ankles after the surgeries, which lead to his referral for a MEB.

Three months prior to separation during an orthopedic appointment, the orthopedist stated, “[The CI] reports improvement in his pain but some mild discomfort residually. He further noted that the CI had some improvement in his feelings of instability on the left and that overall the CI unable to perform his duties as an 11B Infantry Soldier”. The orthopedist further noted that, “… his incisions are well healed; his alignment is good, his range of motion is symmetric and his stability is exam is [sic] significantly improved”. Two weeks following the orthopedic evaluation, during a physical therapy (PT) session, the CI was noted to have “improved [left] ankle mechanics with gait, good tibial translation,” and while performing unilateral calf raises, the CI had decreased (bilateral) endurance. Decreased range-of-motion (ROM), are detailed in the table below.

At the MEB exam (3 months prior to separation), the examiner did not provide a specific examination of the ankles, but stated, “Proceed [with] MEB for ankles only”. A profile written 3 months prior to separation listed extensive duty restrictions [“no running, rucking, jumping, squatting or walking on uneven ground”] and recorded the medical condition as “Bilateral ankle instability”. In the NARSUM (approximately 3 months prior to separation), the CI had normal strength and sensation of the ankles, normal gait/stance and trace (< l mm) anterior ankle laxity bilaterally. The examiner noted that the ROMs were limited by pain. ROM are captured in below chart.

The commander’s statement to the PEB (2 months prior to the CI’s separation), noted that the MEB would evaluate the CI’s ability to perform his duty based on limitations imposed by his permanent physical profile for bilateral ankle instability. The commander notes that the CI stated that he sustained injuries to his ankles at Fort Bliss, TX in 2005, first during pre-deployment training to Iraq and then again while in Iraq. The commander further notes that the CI stated that his ankle pain worsened along with his knee and back pains during this time.

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (2 months post-separation), the CI reported chronic pain for both ankles and wearing braces on ankles for walking. The examiner stated, “With walking long distances more than 200 yards or for prolonged standing for more than an hour he has pain of his ankles”. Examination showed scars on both ankles and intact strength and sensation of both ankles. Gait was described as antalgic with the ankle exams (although it was described as normal with the knee and back exams). The right ankle ROM was decreased but “unlimited by pain” and there was no right ankle instability (pain and stability were not specified for the left ankle). After exercise, there was no additional impairment of joint function by pain, weakness, fatigue, incoordination, or lack of endurance. Remote re-evaluations by the VA obtained over 30 months post-separation, continued the 10% ratings for each of the ankles.

The ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the charts below.

“
Right Ankle ROM
(Degrees)		 PT ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep PT ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep NARSUM ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~2 Mo. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) 5 5 -1,-1,-1 15
Plantar Flexion (45) 40 40 45 (65,65,65) 30
Comment : Surgery 14 M o . Pre-Sep) Using bilateral crutches; impaired gait “u nilat calf raises: … decreased ( bilateral ) endurance” Limited by pain; normal gait; mechanical dorsiflex to 0; trace laxity ROM “Unlimited by pain;” antalgic gait ; DeLuca negative
§4.71a Rating 10%-20% 20% 20% (PEB 10% combined) 10%
Left Ankle ROM
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal)lacks 8” 5 0,0,0 10
Plantar Flexion (45) 31 42 45 (65,65,65) 25
Comment : Surgery 6 M o . Pre-Sep) Diffuse swelling; 1 Mo post- surgery; impaired gait “unilat calf raises: … decreased B endurance” ; Motor weak ; decreased stability Limited by pain; normal gait; mechanical dorsiflex to 0; trace laxity Antalgic gait; DeLuca negative
§4.71a Rating 20% 20% 20% (PEB 10% combined) 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB combined (bundled) the right and left ankle conditions as a single unfitting condition coded analogously to 5003 and rated at 10%. Alternatively, the VA rated each ankle separately using code 5271 (ankle, limited motion of) with a rating of 10% (moderate). Although VASRD §4.71a permits combined ratings of two or more joints under 5003 (under certain conditions), it also allows separate ratings for separately compensable joints. The Board, IAW VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), must consider separate ratings for PEB bilateral joint adjudications; although, separate fitness assessments must be reasonably justified prior to awarding separate disability ratings. In this case, both ankles were considered to fail retention standards; both were implicated by the NARSUM and in the commander’s statement and both were profiled. Members agreed therefore that each ankle is reasonably justified as separately unfitting.

The Board noted the marked similarities in descriptions and examinations of the both ankles and found little to differentiate between the two ankles in terms of disability rating. Each exam described decreased ROM of both ankles (see tables above). The Board adjudged that each ankle had pain-limited motion to at least the minimum compensable rating (10% each IAW VASRD §4.59-painful motion) and considered if alternate coding under code 5271 (ankle, limited motion) to a 20% rating ("marked” limitation) was warranted for either ankle (versus 10% “moderate” limitation). The Service exams documented pain-limited and mechanical ankle dorsiflexion ROM limits to no greater than 5 degrees, while the VA exam documented dorsiflexion to 10 degrees or more and mixed evidence of normal and antalgic gait during the same exam.

Considering the decreased ROMs (both pain-limited and mechanically limited) and additional disabilities found on the Service exams (decreased endurance in the PT exam and joint instability in the NARSUM) only 3 months prior to separation and mindful of §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that it was likely that these issues persisted and reflected the CI’s condition at the time of separation. These ROMs and the disability picture proximate to separation more nearly correspond to “marked” limitation of ankle motion. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), Board consensus recommends a disability rating of 20% for the right ankle and 20% for the left ankle condition each coded 5271.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the bilateral knee conditions were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The bilateral knee conditions were not profiled and were not judged to fail retention standards. The commander’s statement to the PEB (2 months prior to separation), noted the CI’s ankle injuries at Fort Bliss and during his tour in Iraq and that, “His ankle pain worsened along with knee and back pains” during the deployment. The profiles had been exclusively for the bilateral ankle conditions; however, a profile addendum written (2 months prior to separation), by the physical therapist stated, “recommends SM [service member] utilize pool for cardio and strengthening of bilateral ankles and left knee”. The Board also considered that the impairment from the left knee may have been overshadowed by the lower extremity L3 profile for the unfitting bilateral ankle conditions. The right knee condition was not noted to have significant complaints or treatment prior to entry into the disability system and was adjudged as not having approached the level of being unfitting.

The Board subsequently focused on the fitness of the left knee condition. The left knee condition was first mentioned in the STR (5 months prior to separation), when the CI stated, “… my left knee hurts with a dull aching pain”. The CI was referred to orthopedics for evaluation of the left knee (3 months prior to separation), but the provider addressed only the ankle issues. Left knee pain was again mentioned in the MEB exam and the provider wrote, “Meets retention standards” and “Proceed [with] MEB for ankles only”. No specific knee exam was performed. In the NARSUM, the left knee was entered under Past History (without a full history) and was designated as “Meets Retention Standards”. The knees had full ROM, with no further exam details. There was insufficient performance based evidence from the record that either knee condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the contended bilateral knee conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the ankle conditions was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the Service-combined bilateral ankle conditions, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions. The recommended ratings are unanimously the right ankle coded 5271 with a Service disability rating of 20% and by majority vote the left ankle coded 5271 with a Service disability rating of 20%; both IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended bilateral knee conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Ankle Pain 5271 20%
Left Ankle Pain 5271 20%
COMBINED (w/ BLF) 40%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140106, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record







                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review



 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150004303 (PD201400304)
1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 40% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 40% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00705

    Original file (PD2011-00705.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral ankle condition as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% (pre-existing condition) respectively; IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E and the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Therefore, based on all evidence and associated conclusions just elaborated, the Board is assigning preponderant probative value to the MEB evaluation which demonstrated no loss of ROM on the left, limitation of dorsiflexion on the right, persistent subjective mild pain on the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01227

    Original file (PD2012-01227.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. Pre-Sep Right Left -10* 25 2 35 Comment *“Lacks 10⁰ to 0/Neutral DF” Left 10 25 Right 12 35 L ankle w/ mild generalized tenderness; Drawer sign (-); mild valgus-varus laxity; strength 3-4/5; Neurovascular intact; 1+ foot & ankle edema; TTP Left 0-20 0-45 Right NE Normal gait; no painful motion, edema, instability or weakness; no flat feet; no limited function of standing or walking; has left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01652

    Original file (PD-2013-01652.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “bilateral ankle pain and instability post Brostrom reconstruction” and “chronic foot pain due to plantar fasciitis” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The PEB found the referred left knee condition as not unfitting. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Foot Pain due to Plantar Fasciitis5399-53100%Left Foot Plantar Fasciitis with Pes Cavus5299-502010%20040205Right Foot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00370

    Original file (PD-2012-00370.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Left Ankle Pain Condition. Both exams document some aspect of a painful ankle, either painful motion or pain upon palpation. 3 PD1200370 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: VASRD CODE RATING 5271 COMBINED 20% 20% CHRONIC LEFT ANKLE PAIN UNFITTING CONDITION The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120411, w/atchs Exhibit B.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00394

    Original file (PD2012-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ Normal) Extension (0⁰ Normal) Comment PT ~7 Mo. Symptoms included ankle popping (predominately right); shin pain knees pop and can swell; with “knees and ankles are stiff and weak and his legs can give out.” The examiner stated “He has generalized and multiple symptoms regarding the lower extremities and it is difficult to sort them out specifically on taking the history.” The examiner indicated there was no foot condition; there was bilateral shin pain and right...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00096

    Original file (PD2010-00096.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (91B10, Combat Medic) medically separated for a bilateral ankle condition. The Board further acknowledges the CI’s assertion that his knee, hip and back conditions are related to his unfitting ankle condition and therefore should be subject to additional disability rating; although, the Board must note that a causality linkage of these contended...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01218

    Original file (PD2010-01218.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “Was rated at 10% for back, 10% for ankles, 0% for migraines, and nothing for heart attack with stent and asthma. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a 10% Service disability rating for the right ankle condition, coded 5299-5262; and, a 0% Service disability rating for the left ankle condition, coded 5299-5271. In the matter of the bilateral ankle condition the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01978

    Original file (PD2012 01978.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions, characterized as “bilateral retropatellar pain syndrome with subjective ankle pain,” “neck pain,” and“acute chronic low back pain” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The informal PEBadjudicated the “neck, low back, bilateral knee and ankle pain with subjective symptoms only, x-rays and exam essentially normal, rated (and diagnosed) as myofascial pain syndrome” conditionas unfitting, with likely...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02599

    Original file (PD-2014-02599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated it at 10%, coded 5237 (lumbosacral strain).The Board agreed that the evidence in record supported the 10% rating according to the current Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD)general formula for rating the spine based upon combined TL ROM of greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees. Bilateral knee conditions . In the matter of the chronic LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01137

    Original file (PD2012 01137.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The PEB also found the CI’s patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), hypertension, and chronic tension headaches to be Category III; conditions that are not separately unfitting and do not contribute to the unfitting condition.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board also concluded that the PEB properly subsumed the s/p tear of anterior talofibular and calcaneal fibular ligaments, and the...